ATTENTION COURTS -
“Real Estate Merger” itself proves CCT planned the Bundles scam in 2002, and Courts are WRONG to believe NM&F or H&K’s REPEATED LIES INDER OATH vouching to the Courts that CCT “Conceived” Bundles 70 days after the p&s, on Jan 9, 2003! CCT knows in 2002 that Bundles will turn $4.3 into only $1.3. JANUARY 9 2003 IS FAKE EVIDENCE! CCT is Counting $73,000 in 2002 Bundle Revenue in this document!
Notably, Lawyers VOUCHED PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF 2003 BUNDLES THEN TRIED TO CLAIM CCT “FULLY DISCLOSED BUNDLES IN 2002”!
This Officer Of The Court had sworn for years that Jan 9, 2003 (Exh #19) was an absolute alibi proving CCT “Could Not” have concealed Bundles in 2002. NOW he’s forced to swear that CCT “FULLY DISCLOSED” Bundles in 2002. Good luck explaining THAT Asshole!
#3. Sworn Admissions of CCT’s Management “BUNDLES” IN PLACE FOR YEARS BEFORE THE 2002 P&S!
There were 3 CCT executives who worked with me during a year of negotiating the terms
of the potential sale.
CCT President & Publisher Meyer, CCT Advertising Manager Evans,
and CCT Business Internet Manager Kempf.
When Asked specifically in sworn Deposition Testimony, NOT ONE of them even CLAIMED CCT “Conceived Bundles” in 2003.
Consider !!!!! CCT Internet Manager Kempf authored the FAKE January 9, 2003 Bundle
Plan (Exh #19).
Kempf stated CCT had been Bundling back
to 2000. HE KNEW BUNDLES WERENT NEW WHEN HE WROTE !
Cape Cod Times Advertising Director Evans when asked if CCT Bundled in 2002 answered “Yes”. SHE KNEW EXH #19 WAS FAKE!
Cape Cod Times President and Publisher Meyer answered “I actually dont know when it started”. SURE PETERNOCHIO, SURE
These were 2010 Depositions. 8 years after they committed the crime. 3 years into
expensive litigation.
Not ONE of them backed January 9, 2003 (Exh 19) as the date
CCT “Conceived” of Bundles. BUT Exh #19 won them the lawsuit!
SO WHY IN GODS NAME
ARE TWO LAW FIRMS GOING INTO COURT CALLING ME A LIAR AND VOUCHING FOR EXHIBIT #19?
And
HOW did 3 courts, a dozen different judges, and another dozen law clerks, IGNORE
the admissions and Records of guilt?
A 4th executive, CCT Controller Hundt, was not made available for Deposition at threat of sanctions by the court, shows the Docket. There is no doubt HE could explain to us where that $73,000 in 2002 “Real Estate Book Bundle” revenue went and why It wasn't disclosed to me or paid! And Hidden from Courts.
Here We have 2 CCT executives CONFIRM Bundles were in place in 2002, BEFORE the p&s. One of them admits back to 2000. IF NOT FOR LAWYERS LYING TO JUDGES, I WIN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT! The $1,000,000 I sued them for was too conservative based on the actual amounts and depth of the conspiracy.
The NIGHTMARE I endured in this extended litigation is Caused SOLELY by the fraudulent litigation misconduct of Nutter & Fish and Holland & Knight. I was fighting for my life while they were telling courts I was a liar. These firms should face sanctions, financially and criminally.
Below are the EXACT answers by Cape Cod Times to the specific question at hand. “Bundles” Are Joint Internet & Print advertising Products.
So, having had my business stolen, missing many of my body parts, trying to figure out how to pay for ongoing medical treatments, I simply am looking for help in bringing the people responsible for this ordeal to justice.
The Links to various aspects of the crime are shown above.. I welcome anyone to test the veracity of my claims. Every Single one.
Thank you,
Robert Fontaine -
508-
bob@fontainesdomains.com
Barnstable Superior Court May 2, 2012 Summary Judgment Ruling Proves ATTORNEY PERJURY
Worked!
These 9 statements, in a 15 page ruling, prove they MISTAKENLY believed CCT
Lawyers that Exh #19, Jan 2003 Bundle Plan is legitimate.
So I was forced to Appeal Pro Se with my 1st cancer. And as Corrupt as CCT was, as Corrupt as Nutter McClennen & Fish had been, I was about to deal with Holland & Knight, who defiled the court even worse!
CONSIDER THIS CRAP! Atty Mitchell’s 2013 Affidavit SWORE to the court of the 2002
Smoking Gun -
But then when I catch him in his lie he tries to suggest that The Real Estate Merger
-
Perhaps the Appeals Court should have considered what Barnstable Had Ruled on that subject! “Plaintiff admits that “Bundling” was not discussed during negotiations, and the record reflects this concept was not formally proposed until January 2003’.
I have NM&F swearing Bundles were “conceived in 2003”, I have the Barnstable court saying CCT “could not” commit the crime because Bundles were conceived in 2003.
I have H&K swear that “CCT conceived of the Bundle Strategy in early 2003”, yet CCT ALSO the Smoking Gun (With 2002 Bundles for THIS SALE) was fully disclosed and presented to Fontaine..” In 2002.
I HAD CAUGHT MITCHELL IN HIS LIE, SO HE TRIED TO CLAIM CCT FULLY “DISCLOSED” THE
2002 Bundle Plan (Smoking Gun).
YET NM&F CONVINCED BARNSTABLE THAT BUNDLES WERE NEVER
DISCUSSED, AND “COULD NOT” BE SINCE CONCEIVED IN 2003.
Hey Mitchell, which is it? Had CCT showed me the $1.3 Projection using “Bundles” instead of the FAKE $4.3 inducement Projection, I wouldn't have sold them my valuable business. *And I wouldnt have sued CCT for concealing them.
THE LAWYERS CONTRADICT THEMSELVES, THEIR CLIENT, THE RECORD EVIDENCE AND THE SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT RULING.
THE SMOKING GUN SHOWS THE BARNSTABLE WAS LIED TO BY NM&F AND THE
APPEALS COURT LIED TO BY H&K. FOR FEES.
Holland & Knight’s Appellate Briefs, CCT now under the ownership of News Corp, are absurd!
Attempting to defend the indefensible, and committing perjury while doing it.
CCT, having WON in Barnstable based on the FAKE January 9, 2003 Bundle Plan (Exhibit #19), THIS IDIOT LAWYER tries to get away with telling the court some PRETTY RIDICULOUS AND CONFLICTING “FACTS”:
He says the “Smoking Gun” doesn't even reference Bundles -
HE SAYS IT has “nothing to do with Bundles” -
THEN WHEN I CATCH THIS CROOK IN HIS LIES, he SWEARS THAT THE “SMOKING GUN” “WAS FULLY DISCLOSED AND PROVIDED” TO ME IN 2002.
REALLY ATTORNEY MITCHELL? You are hired a decade after the p&s, but you somehow know that CCT “disclosed” the Smoking Gun Bundle Plan to me in 2002, even as you filed Multiple affidavits SWEARING to the Courts that CCT “conceived” Bundles SPECIFICALLY on January 9, 2003?
AND you have the NERVE to say “even if” the Smoking Gun establishes CCT “conceived” of Bundling prior to the p&s (which it does not).. IT CERTAINLY DOES!
You friggen lawyers swearing since 2007 that CCT conceived Bundles January 2003!
IN SPITE OF YOUR CLIENT AND THEIR RECORDS PROVING OTHERWISE.
THIS CROOK CLAIMS IN #17 THAT THE 2002 ENTRY FOR “REAL ESTATE BOOK BUNDLES” HAS “absolutely nothing” to do with the “Bundles” I sued CCT for concealing in 2002? COUNSELOR, CCT’s secret plan for the sale counting Bundles for the entire deal is EXACTLY what I am suing them for!
Mass Appeals Court 12/23/13 Ruling (View):
“After the agreement was executed, CCTimes
began to sell internet advertising in a “Bundle” with print advertising, charging
a discounted price for the internet advertising”. NOT TRUE! You may want to look
at the evidence for the 1st time!
SINCE WHEN DO COURTS RELY ON LAWYERS PAID BY BIG
MONEY INSTEAD OF THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE?
CCT admits they had been bundling for years, their records show them planning the scam with bundles in 2002, their marketing shows them selling Bundles for years, Attorney Mitchell swore that CCT “disclosed” the document with 2002 Bundles “during negotiations”.
These lawyers were allowed to lie through their asses, change stories to fit their needs when trapped by evidence, claim personal knowledge of facts their own client disavows.
THE FILTHY COMPANY PAID TWO FILTHY LAW FIRMS TO SELL TWO IGNORANT COURTS A LINE OF
CRAP.
AND THEY NOW OWE ME ABOUT $5,000,000 -
To right is the end of CCT’S Summary Judgement Motion.
Here is the itemized collection of FALSE statements
made by Attorney Manning IN that
Motion.
I identified about a dozen of them, but am able to pinpoint several more.
This attorney who swore to uphold the law, spent 5 years lying to the court on behalf of her wealthy clients.
As I was fighting for my life and simply pointing out to the courts that CCT had admitted the crime, this lawyer was telling the court that I AM A LIAR, and that I was simply unhappy the way things turned out.
Ya, sure lady, I didnt like it when your client gave me fake projections while planning to undercut the value of my business by some $3,000,000 in revenue.
And I wasnt please that they ALTERED the p&s 2 weeks before closing, making your accusation that I was unhappy with the deal just another insulting falsehood among your many. You DIRTY client had CHANGED the “Deal” (the p&s) so they could PRETEND to invent Bundles “after” the p&s, and the scam could work.
Nutter, McClennen & Fish, as well as succeeding counsel Holland & Knight, LLC, must be REALLY proud that their lawyers can so freely go into the Courts of Massachusetts, and lie for legal fees.
THIS attorney's law firm managed to convince 2 Yarmouth Detective cars to come to MY HOME as a warning, because I sent her THIS Journal of the crime and reminded her of her duty to correct the false statements to the courts.
The lawyers bigger thieves than their client, which is saying something! And the Courts of Massachusetts dont have a lot to be proud either!
I hope some day it comes back to bite you in the ass. If I live long enough, IT WILL!